Aw. Lucky et al., COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF 2 0.025-PERCENT TRETINOIN GELS - RESULTS FROM A MULTICENTER, DOUBLE-BLIND, PARALLEL STUDY, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 38(4), 1998, pp. 17-23
Background: The addition of polyolprepolymer-2 in tretinoin formulatio
ns may reduce tretinoin-induced cutaneous irritation. Objective: This
study compared the efficacy and safety of a new 0.025% tretinoin gel c
ontaining polyolprepolymer-2, its vehicle, and a commercially-availabl
e 0.025% tretinoin gel in patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris
. Methods: In this 12-week multicenter, double-blind, parallel group s
tudy, efficacy was evaluated by objective lesion counts and the invest
igators' global evaluations. Subjective assessment of cutaneous irrita
tion by the investigators and patients evaluated safety. Results: The
efficacy of the two active treatments in this 215 patient study was co
mparable, and both treatments were statistically significantly more ef
fective than vehicle. When compared with the commercially-available tr
etinoin gel, the formulation containing polyolprepolymer-2 demonstrate
d statistically significantly less peeling at days 28, 56, and 84, sta
tistically significantly less dryness by day 84, and statistically sig
nificantly less itching at day 14. Irritation scores for the formulati
on containing polyolprepolymer-2 were numerically lower but not statis
tically different from those of the commercially-available gel for ery
thema and burning. The number of cutaneous and noncutaneous adverse ev
ents were similar for both active medications. Conclusion: The two 0.0
25% gels studied demonstrated comparable efficacy. However, the gel fo
rmulation containing polyolprepolymer-2 caused significantly less peel
ing and drying than the commercially-available formulation by day 84 o
f the study.