Rm. Kotloff et al., COMPARISON OF SHORT-TERM FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING UNILATERAL ANDBILATERAL LUNG-VOLUME REDUCTION SURGERY, Chest, 113(4), 1998, pp. 890-895
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Respiratory System","Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Study objectives: To compare short-term functional outcomes following
unilateral and bilateral lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) performe
d in patients with advanced emphysema. Methods: LVRS was pet-formed un
ilaterally in 32 patients and bilaterally in 119 patients. Pulmonary f
unction testing and 6-min walk test (6MWT) were performed preoperative
ly and repeated at 3 to 6 months postoperatively, Results: Bilateral L
VRS was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (10% vs 0%, p<
0.05) and a higher incidence of postoperative respiratory failure (12.
6% vs 0%; p<0.05) compared with unilateral LVRS. There was no signific
ant difference in duration of air leaks between unilateral and bilater
al groups, but the mean hospital stay was significantly longer followi
ng bilateral LVRS (21.1+/-32.0 days vs 14.2+/-14.0 days; p<0.05). Preo
peratively, there was no significant difference between the unilateral
and bilateral groups with respect to FEV1, FVC, residual volume, or 6
MWT distance. However, for all of these parameters, the magnitude of i
mprovement was significantly greater following bilateral LVRS. Notably
, the magnitude of improvement in each parameter following unilateral
LVRS exceeded half that following bilateral LVRS, suggesting that func
tional outcomes after the unilateral procedure were disproportionate t
o the amount of tissue resected. Serial functional assessment of seven
patients undergoing staged unilateral procedures (two unilateral proc
edures separated in time by at least 3 months) demonstrated somewhat u
npredictable responses; failure to achieve a favorable response to the
initial procedure did not necessarily portend a similar outcome with
the contralateral side, and vise versa. Conclusions: Bilateral LVRS pr
oduces a greater magnitude of short-term functional improvement than d
oes the unilateral procedure and should be considered the procedure of
choice for most patients. Unilateral LVRS should be reserved for pati
ents in whom factors contraindicating entrance into one hemithorax exi
st.