RECOMBINANT HUMAN GRANULOCYTE-COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR (FILGRASTIM) FOLLOWING HIGH-DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY AND PERIPHERAL-BLOOD PROGENITOR-CELL RESCUE IN HIGH-GRADE NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA - CLINICAL BENEFITS AT NO EXTRA COST
Sm. Lee et al., RECOMBINANT HUMAN GRANULOCYTE-COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR (FILGRASTIM) FOLLOWING HIGH-DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY AND PERIPHERAL-BLOOD PROGENITOR-CELL RESCUE IN HIGH-GRADE NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA - CLINICAL BENEFITS AT NO EXTRA COST, British Journal of Cancer, 77(8), 1998, pp. 1294-1299
In order to evaluate the potential clinical and economic benefits of g
ranulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, filgrastim) following per
ipheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) rescue after high-dose chemother
apy (HDCT), 23 consecutive patients aged less than 60 years with poor-
prognosis, high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were entered into a
prospective randomized trial between May 1993 and September 1995. Pat
ients were randomized to receive either PBPC alone (n = 12) or PBPC+G-
CSF (n = II) after HDCT with busulphan and cyclophosphamide. G-CSF (30
0 mu g day(-1)) was given from day +5 until recovery of granulocyte co
unt to greater than 1.0 x 10(9) l(-1) for 2 consecutive days. The mean
time to achieve a granulocyte count > 0.5 x 10(9) l(-1) was significa
ntly shorter in the G-CSF arm (9.7 vs 13.2 days; P<0.0001) as was the
median duration of hospital stay (12 vs 15 days; P = 0.001). In additi
on the recovery periods (range 9-12 vs 11-17 days to achieve a count o
f 1.0 x 10(9) l(-1)) and hospital stays (range 11-14 vs 13-22 days) we
re significantly less variable in patients receiving G-CSF in whom the
values clustered around the median. There were no statistically signi
ficant differences between the study arms in terms of days of fever, d
ocumented episodes of bacteraemia, antimicrobial drug usage and platel
et/red cell transfusion requirements. Taking into account the costs of
total occupied-bed days, drugs, growth factor usage and haematologica
l support, the mean expenditure per inpatient stay was pound 6500 (ran
ge pound 5465-pound 8101) in the G-CSF group compared with pound 8316
(range pound 5953-pound 15 801) in the group not receiving G-CSF, with
an observed mean saving of pound 1816 per patient (or 22% of the tota
l cost) in the G-CSF group. This study suggests that after HDCT and PB
PC rescue, the use of G-CSF leads to more rapid haematological recover
y periods and is associated with a more predictable and shorter hospit
al stay. Furthermore, and despite the additional costs for G-CSF, thes
e clinical benefits are not translated into increased health care expe
nditure.