Mb. Hilding et al., QUALITY-OF-LIFE AFTER KNEE ARTHROPLASTY - A RANDOMIZED STUDY OF 3 DESIGNS IN 42 PATIENTS, COMPARED AFTER 4 YEARS, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica, 68(2), 1997, pp. 156-160
We assessed different yardsticks for outcome 4 (3-5) years after surge
ry in a prospective, randomized study of 42 patients, where 3 designs
of cementless knee prostheses were used. The prognosis with regard to
loosening, previously obtained by radiostereometry after 2 years of fo
llow-up, was utilized. Patients with a prognosis of stable implant fix
ation (two thirds) were compared with those where loosening was predic
ted (one third), Hospital for Special Surgery score and Visual Analogu
e Scales regarding pain at rest, ''first step'' pain, pain during acti
vity and global function, showed consistent postoperative improvements
, but no differences between the design and prognosis groups were foun
d. Radiolucent lines were registered both as yes/no and number of zone
s. Lines and prognosis were associated, but not lines and design group
s. Quality of life assessment by the Nottingham Health Profile questio
nnaire showed that the poor prognosis group had increased pain and sig
nificant disturbances of sleep and emotions, as well as difficulty in
enjoying hobbies and holiday activities. No differences were found bet
ween the design groups. Altogether, the patients showed profiles compa
rable to a healthy reference group. We conclude that the Nottingham He
alth Profile is a sensitive, relevant and simple measure of outcome af
ter knee arthroplasty.