S. Eappen et I. Kissin, EFFECTS OF SUBARACHNOID BUPIVACAINE BLOCK ON ANESTHETIC REQUIREMENTS FOR THIOPENTAL IN RATS, Anesthesiology, 88(4), 1998, pp. 1036-1042
Background: Subarachnoid bupivacaine blockade has been reported to red
uce thiopental and midazolam hypnotic requirements in patients. The pu
rpose of this study was to examine if local anesthetically induced lum
bar intrathecal blockade would reduce thiopental requirements for bloc
kade of motor responses to noxious and nonnoxious stimuli in rats. Met
hods: After intrathecal and external jugular catheter placement, rats
were assigned randomly to two groups in a crossover design study, with
each rat to receive either 10 mu l of 0.75% bupivacaine or 10 mu l of
normal saline intrathecally. The doses of intravenously administered
thiopental required to ablate the eyelid reflex, to block the withdraw
al reflex of a front Limb digit, and to block the corneal reflex were
compared. In two separate groups of animals, hemodynamic parameters an
d concentrations of thiopental in the brain were compared between intr
athecally administered bupivacaine and saline. Results: The thiopental
dose required to block the described responses was decreased with int
rathecally administered bupivacaine versus intrathecally administered
saline from (mean +/- SD) so +/- 5 to 24 +/- 4 mg/kg (P < 0.001) for t
he eyelid reflex, from 51 +/- 6 to 29 +/- 6 mg/kg (P < 0.005) for fron
t limb withdrawal and from 67 +/- 8 to 46 +/- 8 mg/kg (P < 0.01) for t
he corneal reflex. The concentration of thiopental in the brain at the
time of corneal reflex blockade for the group given bupivacaine was s
ignificantly lower than in the group given saline (24.1 vs. 35.8 mu g/
g, P = 0.02). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that lumbar intrathe
cally administered local anesthetic blockade decreases anesthetic requ
irements for thiopental for a spectrum of end points tested. This effe
ct Is due neither to altered pharmacokinetics nor to a direct action o
f the local anesthetic on the brain; rather, it is most likely due to
decreased afferent input.