Ww. Pang et al., THE PERIPHERAL ANALGESIC EFFECT OF MEPERIDINE IN REDUCING PROPOFOL INJECTION PAIN IS NOT NALOXONE-REVERSIBLE, REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 23(2), 1998, pp. 197-200
Background and Objectives. Meperidine is frequently used in general an
esthesia and perioperative analgesia. In addition to its opioid action
, meperidine possesses some local anesthetic properties. A preliminary
study using the tourniquet venous retention technique found meperidin
e to be more effective in reducing propofol injection pain than fentan
yl or morphine, both of which were slightly better than placebo. This
study was undertaken to evaluate whether this peripheral analgesic eff
ect of meperidine is affected by naloxone. Methods. In a randomized, d
ouble-blind manner, after venous occlusion with a tourniquet, meperidi
ne 40 mg was given intravenously to patients in group A (n = 31), mepe
ridine 40 mg followed by naloxone 0.04 mg to group B (n = 32), meperid
ine 40 mg followed by naloxone 0.2 mg to group C (n = 30), and normal
saline placebo to group D (n = 30). The venous retention of drug(s) wa
s maintained for 1 minute, followed by tourniquet release and intraven
ous administration of propofol 100 mg. Pain assessment was made immedi
ately after the propofol injection. Results. All three groups given me
peridine had significantly less propofol injection pain (P <.01) than
the group given saline placebo, and there was no difference among grou
ps A, B, and C. Conclusion. The peripheral analgesic effect of meperid
ine in reducing propofol injection pain is not mediated by its opioid
activity.