Rh. Kerman et al., CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF ANTI-HLA ANTIBODIES PRE AND POST TRANSPLANT, The American journal of the medical sciences, 313(5), 1997, pp. 275-278
Pretransplant histocompatibility testing seeks to select compatible do
nor-recipient pairs for transplantation. Sera from prospective renal t
ransplant recipients are screened for the presence of human leukocyte
antigen (HLA) antibodies to determine humoral alloimmunization, Presen
t techniques screen patient sera using a complement-dependent cytotoxi
city assay and express the results as percent of panel reactive antibo
dy (PRA). However, the standard assay suffers because it needs viable
target cells, a variable sensitivity of cells for complement, subjecti
ve evaluation, a lack of standardized methodology, and a variable corr
elation with clinical outcomes. Alternatively, an enzyme-linked immuno
sorbent assay (ELISA) methodology can detect IgG anti-HLA reactivity b
ased on the binding of immunoglobulin to soluble HLA class I antigens,
This method provides increased objectivity and reproducibility, does
not require use of viable target cells, and most importantly, detects
immunoglobulin that is reactive to HLA class I antigens, Data discusse
d herein suggest that identifying reactive recipient sera using the en
zyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (PRA-STAT, Sang Stat Med, Menl
o Park, CA) methodology may be more informative clinically than curren
t standard percent of panel reactive antibody (PRA) assays.