THE EFFECTS OF ACID PERFUSION OF THE ESOPHAGUS ON VENTILATION AND RESPIRATORY SENSATION

Citation
Sk. Field et al., THE EFFECTS OF ACID PERFUSION OF THE ESOPHAGUS ON VENTILATION AND RESPIRATORY SENSATION, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 157(4), 1998, pp. 1058-1062
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care","Respiratory System
ISSN journal
1073449X
Volume
157
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1058 - 1062
Database
ISI
SICI code
1073-449X(1998)157:4<1058:TEOAPO>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and asthma rema ins controversial. Asthma symptoms worsen with CER, but are not consis tently related to changes in lung function. The purpose of this study was to determine whether acid perfusion (AP) of the esophagus alters v entilation and causes respiratory symptoms. Nonasthmatic patients with normal lung function and esophageal disease (16 females and nine male s, FEV1 %predicted = 99 +/- 9.6), underwent a Bernstein test after mot ility testing. Airflow, rib cage (Vrc>, and abdominal (Vab) tidal volu mes, esophageal (Pes) and gastric (Pga) pressure, and surface (Es) and esophageal (Edi) diaphragm electromyographic (EMC) signals were measu red. Throat, swallowing, chest, and stomach discomfort and respiratory sensation were estimated with the Borg scale. Minute ventilation ((V) over dot E) increased during AP and declined during recovery with sal ine perfusion of the esophagus (7.1 +/- 1.5 to 8.5 +/- 2.4 to 7.3 +/- 2.1 L/min; n = 25; p = 0.0002). Respiratory rate (RR) went from 13.6 /- 2.6 to 15.8 +/- 3.4 to 15.3 +/- 3.1 breaths/min (n = 25; p = 0.0002 ) during AP. (V) over dot E was greater in the Bernstein-positive pati ents during AP. Tidal volume (Vr), Vrc, Vab, Pes, Pga, Es, and Edi did not change during AP. Chest discomfort (D) correlated with ventilatio n ((V) over dot E = 0.7 + 0.8 D; r = 0.67; p < 0.001) and respiratory effort sensation (B) (B = 0.2 + 0.4 (V) over dot E; r = 0.70; p < 0.00 1) during AP. AP did not inhibit diaphragm activity. Increased (V) ove r dot E may explain the paradox of CER worsening respiratory symptoms without changing lung function.