EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPUTATIONAL STUDIES ON AMINOGUANIDINE FREE-BASE, MONOCATION AND DICATION - PART III - PROTON AFFINITIES OF GUANIDINE, AMINOGUANIDINE AND GLYOXAL BIS(AMIDINOHYDRAZONE)

Authors
Citation
Jt. Koskinen, EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPUTATIONAL STUDIES ON AMINOGUANIDINE FREE-BASE, MONOCATION AND DICATION - PART III - PROTON AFFINITIES OF GUANIDINE, AMINOGUANIDINE AND GLYOXAL BIS(AMIDINOHYDRAZONE), Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. B, A journal of chemical sciences, 53(3), 1998, pp. 386-392
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry Inorganic & Nuclear","Chemistry Inorganic & Nuclear
ISSN journal
09320776
Volume
53
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
386 - 392
Database
ISI
SICI code
0932-0776(1998)53:3<386:EACSOA>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
The structures of glyoxal bis(amidinohydrazone) (GBG) free base and gl yoxal bis(amidinohydrazonium) monocation and dication were calculated quantum chemically by using the density functional hybrid method B3-LY P with the standard basis set 6-31G(d). Proton affinities calculated f rom these data are 246.4 kcal/mol for the free base and 176.0 kcal/mol for the monocation. The proton affinities of guanidine free base (246 .2 kcal/mol), aminoguanidine free base (242.9 kcal/mol), aminoguanidin ium monocation (88.6 kcal/mol) were calculated for reference. The B3-L YP functional overestimates the proton affinities for all the species studied. For example, for guanidine the proton affinity at the MP2/6-3 1G(d) level is 238.3 kcal/mol, the experimental reference value being 233 kcal/mol. However, from the B3-LYP values it can be concluded that in the gas phase all the three bases are nearly equally basic. On the other hand. it is known that in aqueous solution guanidine is a much stronger base than aminoguanidine and glyoxal bis(amidinohpdrazone). T he results are discussed from the point of view of molecular size, sha pe and symmetry, and hydrogen bonding in solution.