USE OF DERMAL EQUIVALENT AND SKIN EQUIVALENT MODELS FOR IN-VITRO CUTANEOUS IRRITATION TESTING OF COSMETIC PRODUCTS - COMPARISON WITH IN-VIVO HUMAN DATA

Citation
C. Augustin et al., USE OF DERMAL EQUIVALENT AND SKIN EQUIVALENT MODELS FOR IN-VITRO CUTANEOUS IRRITATION TESTING OF COSMETIC PRODUCTS - COMPARISON WITH IN-VIVO HUMAN DATA, Journal of toxicology. Cutaneous and ocular toxicology, 17(1), 1998, pp. 5-17
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Toxicology,Ophthalmology
ISSN journal
07313829
Volume
17
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
5 - 17
Database
ISI
SICI code
0731-3829(1998)17:1<5:UODEAS>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
The development of new cosmetic formulations requires precise assessme nt of their safety and efficacy. Today, legislation imposes increasing measures of safety as well as the limitation of animal use for such t esting (European Community directive 93/35/CEE). Subsequently, safety assessment protocols now focus on in vivo human volunteer tests and in vitro methods. In this study, in vivo testing consisted of 48 h patch tests on human volunteers followed by a clinical evaluation of irrita tion based on a visual scoring system including evaluation of erythema , edema, dryness, and vesicles. For in vitro testing to substantiate t he safety of cosmetic products, we propose two three-dimensional model s, a dermal equivalent (DE) and a skin equivalent (SE). The DE is comp osed of a porous collagen-glycosaminoglycans-chitosan dermal substrate populated by normal human fibroblasts. The SE is completed by a fully differentiated epidermis made by seeding normal human keratinocytes o nto the DE. To evaluate the usefulness of such in vitro models for cyt otoxicity trials, 14 cosmetic products reflecting a range of galenic f orms (oil, mascara, cream, lotion) were tested both in vivo and in vit ro. In vitro testing consisted of a topical application (10 mu l) of p ure or appropriate dilution of cosmetic products, reflecting future us e, onto DEs and SEs (n = 6). After a 24 h contact, measurement of resi dual cellular viability using the MTT test as well as LDH and IL-1 alp ha release measurement allowed an evaluation of the skin irritation po tential. The in vitro results were compared to the in vivo data using a binary correlation based on the irritation potential prediction (non irritating/irritating). A concordance of 71% and 79%, respectively, fo r the DE model and the SE model were obtained versus in vivo data.