M. Takasoh et al., STEADY-STATE PVECP IS SUPERIOR TO TRANSIENT PVECP IN THE DIAGNOSIS OFOPTIC NEURITIS, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica, 76(2), 1998, pp. 230-233
Purpose: To compare the diagnostic value for optic neuritis between tr
ansient pattern visual evoked potentials (PVECP) and steady-state PVEC
P, Subjects & Methods: We retrospectively studied 86 eyes of 69 patien
ts with optic neuritis who visited our clinic. PVECPs to 3 rev/sec sti
mulation (transient) and 12 rev/sec stimulation (steady-state), were r
ecorded in all patients. Results: All of the cases with non-recordable
transient PVECP showed non recordable steady-state PVECP, Conversely;
the cases with non-recordable steady-state PVECP often showed measura
ble transient PVECP where the latency of the P100 component was delaye
d. In 51 cases with unilateral optic neuritis the amplitude ratio of t
he P100; affected eye/non-affected eye was significantly smaller in th
e steady-state PVECP than in the transient PVECP. Conclusion: To detec
t visual dysfunction in optic neuritis, a steady-state PVECP was more
sensitive than a transient PVECP.