ESTIMATING TREE CANOPY WATER-USE VIA XYLEM SAPFLOW IN AN OLD NORWAY SPRUCE FOREST AND A COMPARISON WITH SIMULATION-BASED CANOPY TRANSPIRATION ESTIMATES

Citation
B. Kostner et al., ESTIMATING TREE CANOPY WATER-USE VIA XYLEM SAPFLOW IN AN OLD NORWAY SPRUCE FOREST AND A COMPARISON WITH SIMULATION-BASED CANOPY TRANSPIRATION ESTIMATES, Annales des Sciences Forestieres, 55(1-2), 1998, pp. 125-139
Citations number
59
Categorie Soggetti
Forestry
ISSN journal
00034312
Volume
55
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
125 - 139
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4312(1998)55:1-2<125:ETCWVX>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Tree xylem sapflow rates of 140-year-old Norway spruce (Picea abies) w ere scaled to the stand level and compared to canopy transpiration pre dicted by the stand gas exchange model STANDFLUX. Variation in sapflux densities between individual sensors was high (coefficient of varianc e = 0.4) and included both variation within and between trees, but it was not different between two applied sapflow methodologies (radial fl owmeter according to Granier, variable heating tissue heat balance met hod according to Cermak and Kucera). During the morning, a time-lag of typically 2 h elapsed between sapflow (E-f) and predicted canopy tran spiration rate (E-p). During this time total water use was as high as 0.3 mm, which was less than the estimated capacity of easily available water in the tree canopy (0.45 mm, on average 14 L per tree). Canopy conductance derived from stand sapflow rates (g(f)) and from STANDFLUX (g(p)) was in the same range (g(tmax): 10 mm s(-1)), but a stronger d ecline with increasing vapor pressure deficit of the air (D) was obser ved for g(f) as compared to g(p) with current model parameterization. Tree water uptake measured by xylem sapflow was higher during spring a nd somewhat lower during summer compared with E-p. Seasonal sums of tr anspiration from April to October amounted to 108 and 103 mm season(-1 ) for E-f and E-p, respectively. Estimated tree water uptake during ni ght increased with D up to 0.5 mm per dark period (on average 16 L per tree) which was 10-140 % of total daily flux. Because this flow rate did not increase with further increases in D during night, it is concl uded that it reflects the refilling of easily exchangeable water in th e trees rather than a rate of night transpiration. ((C) Inra/Elsevier, Paris.).