The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the measuremen
t of urinary excretion of the brush-border enzyme gamma glutamyltransf
erase (GGT), in comparison with that of alanine aminopeptidase (AAP),
as a marker for tubular toxicity due to contrast media (CM). Urinary a
ctivities of AAP and GGT were measured prior to the administration of
CM and 1, 3 and 5 days after in forty-nine adult renal patients underg
oing a radiological examination with intravascular administration of C
M. The behavior of CGT was similar to that of AAP. In fact, urinary ac
tivities of both AAP and GGT increased greatly after CM. This effect w
as maximal on the 1st day and statistically significant for both enzym
es. Furthermore, on the 1st day a relevant increase of enzyme activity
(at least +50% over the basal value) was observed in the same number
of patients (67%) for AAP and GGT. The concordance between GGT and AAP
variations was high and statistically significant Finally, different
variables (osmolarity, dose of CM, and baseline renal function of the
patients) had a similar effect on urinary excretion of AAP and GGT.The
repeatability of duplicated determinations of GGT resulted better tha
n that of AAP. In conclusion, the good concordance of the results of G
GT with those of AAP justifies the use of GGT as a marker for tubular
effects due to CM. Furthermore, the measurement of GGT has a better re
peatability than that of AAP.