PSYCHOLOGY AND CAPITAL LITIGATION - RESEARCH CONTRIBUTIONS TO COURTROOM CONSULTATION

Citation
Mt. Nietzel et al., PSYCHOLOGY AND CAPITAL LITIGATION - RESEARCH CONTRIBUTIONS TO COURTROOM CONSULTATION, Applied & preventive psychology, 7(2), 1998, pp. 121-134
Citations number
105
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology, Clinical","Psychology, Applied
ISSN journal
09621849
Volume
7
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
121 - 134
Database
ISI
SICI code
0962-1849(1998)7:2<121:PACL-R>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
After briefly reviewing the history of capital punishment in the Unite d States, we describe the activities most often performed by behaviora l science litigation consultants, and we review five areas of psychole gal research that courtroom consultants can call on to guide their int erventions. The research literatures of most frequent use to psycholeg al researchers and litigation consultants are (a) assessment of public opinion about crime and punishment, (b) the effects of death qualific ation during voir dire, (c) the process and effects of sentencing-phas e evidence, (d) the possibility of discriminatory application of the d eath penalty, and (e) the effects of litigation consultation itself. P ractical implications for consultants from each of these literatures a re considered.