Mt. Nietzel et al., PSYCHOLOGY AND CAPITAL LITIGATION - RESEARCH CONTRIBUTIONS TO COURTROOM CONSULTATION, Applied & preventive psychology, 7(2), 1998, pp. 121-134
After briefly reviewing the history of capital punishment in the Unite
d States, we describe the activities most often performed by behaviora
l science litigation consultants, and we review five areas of psychole
gal research that courtroom consultants can call on to guide their int
erventions. The research literatures of most frequent use to psycholeg
al researchers and litigation consultants are (a) assessment of public
opinion about crime and punishment, (b) the effects of death qualific
ation during voir dire, (c) the process and effects of sentencing-phas
e evidence, (d) the possibility of discriminatory application of the d
eath penalty, and (e) the effects of litigation consultation itself. P
ractical implications for consultants from each of these literatures a
re considered.