PERFORMANCE EVALUATION IN WORK SETTINGS

Recent research from 1993 on performance evaluations in work settings is reviewed and integrated with the prior reset and historical bases. Contemporary research reflects several themes: General models; of job performance are being developed, the job performance domain is being e xpanded, research continues to explore the psychometric characteristic s of performance ratings, research is developing on potential bias in ratings, rater training is examined, and research continues in terms o f efforts to attach utility values to rated performance. We conclude t hat research is progressing in traditional content areas as well in th e exploration of new ground. Researchers are recognizing that job perf ormance is more than just the execution of specific tasks and that it involves a wider array of important organizational activities. There i s also an increased optimism regarding the use of supervisory ratings and recognition that such ''subjective'' appraisal instruments do not automatically translate into rater error or bias.