Objective: Lack of intimacy has been identified as an important provok
ing agent that increases the risk of depressive symptoms in women. Thi
s study precisely characterized lack of intimacy by assessing a woman'
s attachment style and investigated the specificity of association bet
ween depressive symptoms and an anxious attachment pattern. Method: Fo
ur hundred and twenty women participated in the cross-sectional study
of depressive symptomatology and anxious attachment. All participants
completed the following measures: a sociodemographic questionnaire, th
e Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), the Rec
iprocal Attachment Questionnaire, the Social Support Questionnaire, th
e Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the Global Assessment of Recent Str
ess Scale. Results: A score of 16 or above on the CES-D, which indicat
es the presence of depressive symptoms, was used to divide the sample
into 2 groups: a depressed group (N = 129) and a nondepressed group (N
= 291). We found that women in the depressive symptomatology group we
re more likely than women in the nondepressive symptomatology group to
exhibit anxious attachment and adverse social and cognitive character
istics. Lower levels of self-esteem and higher levels of recent stress
were also predictive of depressive symptomatology. Feared loss of the
attachment figure and a lack of use of the attachment figure were ind
ependent predictors of depressive symptomatology in the same model. Co
nclusion: The feared loss of security associated with an attachment fi
gure seems to be related to an increased likelihood of depressive symp
toms.