A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED 1-YEAR CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING TRANSURETHRAL NEEDLE ABLATION TO TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA
R. Bruskewitz et al., A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED 1-YEAR CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING TRANSURETHRAL NEEDLE ABLATION TO TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA, The Journal of urology, 159(5), 1998, pp. 1588-1593
Purpose: We assess the 1-year efficacy and safety of transurethral nee
dle ablation of the prostate compared to transurethral resection of th
e prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplas
ia (BPH). Materials and Methods: A prospective, randomized clinical tr
ial of 121 men 50 years old or older with symptomatic BPH was performe
d at 7 medical centers across the United States. Of the men 65 (54%) w
ere treated with transurethral needle ablation of the prostate and 56
(46%) underwent transurethral resection of the prostate. Mean and perc
entage changes from baseline and between cohorts for American Urologic
al Association (AUA) symptom score, AUA bother score, quality of life
score, peak urinary flow rate and post-void residual urine volume were
measured at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following treatment. Length of proc
edure, hospitalization, type of anesthesia, post-procedure catheteriza
tion, side effects and sexual function were compared. Results: Transur
ethral needle ablation and resection resulted in a statistically signi
ficant improvement in AUA symptom, bother and quality of life scores,
peak urinary flow rate and post-void residual. At 1-year followup, nee
dle ablation and resection were equally effective in enhancing quality
of life. Needle ablation had less effect on sexual function, with res
ection being associated with a greater incidence of retrograde ejacula
tion. Needle ablation could be performed as an outpatient procedure wi
th local anesthesia while resection required anesthesia and hospitaliz
ation. Needle ablation was associated with markedly fewer side effects
than resection. Conclusions: Compared to transurethral resection of t
he prostate, transurethral needle ablation of the prostate is an effic
acious, minimally invasive treatment for symptomatic BPH that is assoc
iated with few side effects.