Social democratic governments in Australia and New Zealand adopted pol
icies of radical free-market reform, including financial deregulation,
privatization, and public-sector reform in the 1980s. Because of the
absence of institutional obstacles to government action, reform was fa
ster and more comprehensive in New Zealand than in Australia. The New
Zealand reforms were associated with increasing inequality and general
ly poor economic outcomes. There is nothing in the New Zealand experie
nce to support the view that radical free-market economic policies are
consistent with social democratic welfare policies or with social dem
ocratic values of concern for the disadvantaged, The Australian reform
s were less radical, and were accompanied by some refurbishment of the
welfare state. Economic performance did nor improve, as anticipated b
y advocates of reform, but was considerably better than that of New Ze
aland.