Jl. Stroud et al., ENAMEL THICKNESS OF THE POSTERIOR DENTITION - ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR NONEXTRACTION TREATMENT, The Angle orthodontist, 68(2), 1998, pp. 141-146
This study describes mesial and distal enamel thickness of the permane
nt posterior mandibular dentition. The sample comprised 98 Caucasian a
dults (59 males, 39 females) 20 to 35 years old. Bitewing radiographs
of the right permanent mandibular premolars and first and second molar
s were illuminated and transferred to a computer at a fixed magnificat
ion via a video camera. Enamel and dentin thicknesses were identified
and digitized on the plane representing the maximum mesiodistal diamet
er of each tooth. The results showed that there were no significant se
x differences in either mesial or distal enamel thickness. Enamel on t
he second molars was significantly thicker (0.3 to 0.4 mm) than enamel
on the premolars. Distal enamel was significantly thicker than mesial
enamel. There was approximately 10 mm of total enamel on the four tee
th combined. Assuming 50% enamel reduction, the premolars and molars s
hould provide 9.8 mm of additional space for realignment of mandibular
teeth.