S. Gulec et al., COMPARISON OF CAUDAL BUPIVACAINE, BUPIVACAINE MORPHINE AND BUPIVACAINE-MIDAZOLAM MIXTURES FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN CHILDREN, European journal of anaesthesiology, 15(2), 1998, pp. 161-165
Sixty children undergoing inguinal or urogenital surgery were allocate
d randomly to three groups to receive a caudal injection of either 0.1
25% bupivacaine 0.75 mL kg(-1) with 0.5% midazolam 50 mu g kg(-1) (n=2
0) or with 1% morphine chlorhydrate 0.05mg kg(-1) (n= 20), or bupivaca
ine alone (n=20) after surgery under general anaesthesia. There were n
o significant changes in heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate
or oxygen haemoglobin saturation values in all groups, and there were
no significant differences in the incidence of vomiting and pruritus b
etween the groups (P>0.05). Sedation scores were higher in the bupivac
aine-midazolam and the bupivacaine-morphine groups than in the bupivac
aine group at 8-12 h post-operatively (P>0.01). The durations of analg
esia were 21.15+/-1.2h in the bupivacaine-midazolam group, 14.50+/-1.6
h in the bupivacaine-morphine group and 8.15+/-1.3 h in the bupivacain
e group. Differences between the bupivacaine-midazolam group and the b
upivacaine group (P<0.001), the bupivacaine-midazolam group and the bu
pivacaine-morphine group (P<0.01),, and the bupivacaine-morphine group
and the bupivacaine group (P<0.01) were significant. It is suggested
that caudal administration of a bupivacaine-midazolam mixture produces
a longer duration of post-operative analgesia than a bupivacaine-morp
hine mixture and bupivacaine alone with sedation for 8-12 h post-opera
tively.