REJECTION OF WILD-TYPE AND GENETICALLY-ENGINEERED MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX-DEFICIENT GLIAL-CELL XENOGRAFTS IN THE CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM RESULTS IN BYSTANDER DEMYELINATION AND WALLERIAN DEGENERATION
Mt. Oleary et al., REJECTION OF WILD-TYPE AND GENETICALLY-ENGINEERED MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX-DEFICIENT GLIAL-CELL XENOGRAFTS IN THE CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM RESULTS IN BYSTANDER DEMYELINATION AND WALLERIAN DEGENERATION, Neuroscience, 85(1), 1998, pp. 269-280
Mixed glial cell cultures prepared from neonatal wild type and mutant
male mice lacking either major histocompatibility complex class I, cla
ss II or both class I and II molecules (major histocompatibility compl
ex class (III0/0)-I-0/0), and from syngeneic male rats were transplant
ed into female rat spinal cord white matter. Graft survival was monito
red using DNA probes specific to the Y chromosome. Survival of major h
istocompatibility complex class-deficient grafts was not prolonged com
pared to wild-type grafts and in most cases grafts could not be detect
ed at 28 days post-transplantation, at which lime syngeneic grafts wer
e still present. However, rejection of xenografts resulted in signific
ant bystander damage to host tissue. In recipients of wild-type and ma
jor histocompatibility complex class I-0/0 xenografts the predominant
pathology was demyelination. Demyelination was also observed in recipi
ents of major histocompatibility complex class II0/0 and major histoco
mpatibility complex class (III0/0)-I-0/0 xenografts, however in additi
on there was marked collagen deposition and meningeal cell invasion. S
ignificantly more axons had undergone Wallerian degeneration in recipi
ents of major histocompatibility complex class II0/0 and major histoco
mpatibility complex class (III0/0)-I-0/0 xenografts than recipients of
wild-type and major histocompatibility complex class I-0/0 xenografts
. These findings were interpreted as evidence of a more destructive im
mune response associated with rejection of grafts lacking major histoc
ompatibility complex class II molecules. It was proposed that the diff
erence in the severity of bystander damage may be related to the previ
ously demonstrated ability of xenogeneic major histocompatibility comp
lex class II molecules to activate host T cells directly, whereas xeno
grafts lacking major histocompatibility complex class II molecules wer
e capable of activating host T cells only by the indirect pathway. (C)
1998 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.