Rationale and Objectives. The aim of this study was to determine a mor
e precise and accurate method of quantitating coronary artery calcium
(CAC) detected with electron-beam computed tomography (CT) in patients
with low CAC scores. Materials and Methods. Two 40-section, 3-mm-coll
imation, electrocardiographically gated electron-beam CT examinations
of the heart were performed in each patient. Fifty patients with avera
ge scores between 2 and 100, as determined with the conventional scori
ng algorithm, were selected. The modified conventional scoring algorit
hm was compared with two techniques: calculated calcium volume and app
roximated calcium mass. Results. The percentage difference between sca
ns ranged from 37.2% for the conventional scoring method to 28.2% and
28.4% for volume- and mass-based methods, respectively. Increasing les
ion size thresholds does not improve quantitative precision and reduce
s accuracy in patients with small amounts of CAC. Conclusion. Quantifi
cation methods based on calcification volume or mass decrease score va
riation compared with the conventional scoring method, and increased s
ize threshold does not improve accuracy.