DETECTION OF ANABOLIC-STEROID ADMINISTRATION - RATIO OF URINARY TESTOSTERONE TO EPITESTOSTERONE VS THE RATIO OF URINARY TESTOSTERONE TO LUTEINIZING-HORMONE
Pj. Perry et al., DETECTION OF ANABOLIC-STEROID ADMINISTRATION - RATIO OF URINARY TESTOSTERONE TO EPITESTOSTERONE VS THE RATIO OF URINARY TESTOSTERONE TO LUTEINIZING-HORMONE, Clinical chemistry, 43(5), 1997, pp. 731-735
Our goal in this study was to determine whether the urinary ratio of t
estosterone to luteinizing hormone (T/LH) as an indicator of exogenous
anabolic steroid (AS) use is superior to the urinary ratio of testost
erone to epitestosterone (T/E). After 2 weekly placebo injections, 19
subjects were given testosterone cypionate (TC) injections of 250 or 5
00 mg/week for 14 weeks followed by 14 weekly placebo injections. Pati
ents were considered to have ceased taking TC if they tested negative
9 weeks after their last injection. For detection of illicit or suprap
hysiological TC (AS) use, the urinary T/E ratio of greater than or equ
al to 6 yielded a false-negative rate of 46% and a false-positive rate
of 4%. However, a urinary T/LH ratio of greater than or equal to 30 p
roduced a false-negative rate of only 24% and a false-positive rate of
13%. We conclude that the urinary T/LH ratio of greater than or equal
to 30 is a more sensitive marker of AS use than the urinary T/E ratio
of greater than or equal to 6 and remains sensitive for twice as long
as urinary T/E.