We examine the claim that a class of sprouting-and-retraction models i
s mathematically equivalent to a fixed-anatomy model. We accept, subje
ct to important caveats, a narrow mathematical equivalence of the ener
gy functions in both classes of model. We argue that this narrow equiv
alence of energy functions does not, however, entail equivalence of th
e models. Indeed, the claim of complete model equivalence hides signif
icant dynamical differences between the approaches, which we discuss.
We also disagree that our work demonstrates that subtractive constrain
t enforcement is natural in fixed-anatomy models.