Dr. Shaw et al., FIELD VALIDATION OF WEED-CONTROL RECOMMENDATIONS FROM HERB AND SWC HERBICIDE RECOMMENDATION MODELS, Weed technology, 12(1), 1998, pp. 78-87
Field validation studies were conducted in seven Mississippi environme
nts at three application timings to confirm postemergence (POST) recom
mendations generated by the computer herbicide decision aids HERB and
SWC. HERB and SWC agreed on herbicide treatments in only 14% of the lo
cation-application timing combinations, Weed scientists involved in th
e study agreed on treatment recommendations approximately 33% of the r
ime. The HERB model agreed with a faculty member on only one herbicide
treatment, while the SWC model was slightly more agreeable in this re
gard. Subsequent weed flushes, varied production practices, and delaye
d weed emergence accounted for a majority of the underestimated predic
tions given by HERB. Only 55% of the predicted values presented for es
timated weed control ratings were similar to actual weed control ratin
gs. Over 75% of the predictions that differed from actual weed control
values were underpredictions. Recommendations from both computer mode
ls were effective in reducing yield loss below that of the untreated c
heck, and recommendations from the HERB model generally improved yield
more than those from the SWC model in most instances. HERB and SWC pr
edictions of yield losses with no weed control were not significantly
different from the actual yield loss from the untreated check in nine
of the 12 instances at Starkville, seven of the 12 instances at Brooks
ville, six of the 12 instances at Newton, and three of the six instanc
es at Hollandale. The HERB model estimated yield loss similar to that
of the actual yield loss 83% of the time; while predictions from the S
WC model were accurate 76% of the time. HERB overestimated yield loss
in six of 21 application timing-experiment combinations and underestim
ated yield loss only once. Yield loss was overpredicted as high as 78%
. SWC overpredicted yield loss in live of 21 instances and also undere
stimated in five instances. SWC did not overpredict yield loss to the
same magnitude as HERB in many instances.