Stroke is a major health problem in all industrialised countries and e
vidence is mounting that this problem also affects the developing coun
tries. In the industrialised countries, it is the third largest killer
and, of the survivors, about one-half an left with a permanent handic
ap. Despite the huge burden of stroke on healthcare and social service
s (several USA studies estimate the annual cost of stroke to be betwee
n US $6.5 and 11.2 billion) the cost of strokes has aroused little att
ention. An absence of effective therapies may be one of the reasons fo
r this lack of interest; the costs have been taken as inevitable. With
the advent of new therapies for acute ischaemic stroke (thrombolytics
and neuroprotectants) there is renewed interest in improving both the
management and outcome for patients. Key to the evaluation (both clin
ical and economic) of new stroke therapies is the choice of evaluation
scales/instruments. Increasingly, stroke investigators are using meas
ures of functional outcome (for example the Barthel index) as a primar
y endpoint in stroke trials. This is pertinent, as functional outcome
has been found to reflect reasonably well the degree to which a patien
t needs support after stroke, irrespective of whether this is provided
by the family or society.