STRATEGY UNDER UNCERTAINTY

Citation
H. Courtney et al., STRATEGY UNDER UNCERTAINTY, Harvard business review, 75(6), 1997, pp. 66
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Business
Journal title
ISSN journal
00178012
Volume
75
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Database
ISI
SICI code
0017-8012(1997)75:6<66:>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
At the heart of the traditional approach to strategy Lies the assumpti on that by applying a set of powerful analytic tools, executives can p redict the future of any business accurately enough to allow them to c hoose a clear strategic direction. But what happens when the environme nt is so uncertain that no amount of analysis will allow us to predict the future! What makes for a good strategy in highly uncertain busine ss environments? The authors, consultants at McKinsey & Company, argue that uncertainty requires a new way of thinking about strategy. AU to o often, they say, executives take a binary view: either they underest imate uncertainty to come up with the forecasts required by their comp anies' planning or capital-budging processes, or they overestimate it, abandon all analysis, and go with their gut instinct. The authors out line a new approach that begins by making a crucial distinction among four discrete levels of uncertainty that any company might face. They then explain how a set of generic strategies-shaping the market, adapt ing to it, or reserving the right to play at a later time - can be use d in each of the four levels. And they illustrate how these strategies can be implemented through a combination of three basic types of acti ons: big bets, options, and no-regrets moves. The framework can help m anagers determine which analytic tools can inform decision making unde r uncertainty - and which cannot. At a broader level, it offers execut ives a discipline for thinking rigorously and systematically about unc ertainty and its implications for strategy.