Ja. Fein et al., SALINE WITH BENZYL ALCOHOL AS INTRADERMAL ANESTHESIA FOR INTRAVENOUS LINE PLACEMENT IN CHILDREN, Pediatric emergency care, 14(2), 1998, pp. 119-122
Background: It has been suggested that saline with benzyl alcohol pres
ervative has anesthetic properties when injected intradermally, We com
pared the pain associated with intravenous line (i.v.) placement in pa
tients who received intrader mal lidocaine, intradermal saline + benzy
l alcohol preservative, or no anesthesia, Methods: We performed a pros
pective randomized clinical trial in a convenience sample of children
over 6.8 years old seen in the emergency department of a large, urban
children's hospital. Children received either intradermal saline with
0.9% benzyl alcohol preservative, intradermal lidocaine, or no anesthe
sia prior to i.v. placement, The patient recorded the pain of the enti
re procedure on a visual analog scale. In the two groups that received
an intradermal injection, the patient also recorded the pain of the f
irst and second injection on a similar scale. Results: Ninety-nine chi
ldren were studied, 33 in each group. Pain scores were not normally di
stributed, The median pain scores in millimeters for the entire proced
ure were 41.0 (in terquartile range, 11 to 62) in the nonanesthetic gr
oup, 9.0 (interquartile range 3 to 37) in the saline with benzyl alcoh
ol group,and 10.0 (interquartile range, 4 to 32) in the lidocaine grou
p (P = 0.006 for saline vs nonanesthetic, P = 0.04 for lidocaine vs no
nanesthetic, P = 0.57 for saline vs lidocaine), There was no differenc
e between groups with regard to baseline anxiety, demographic characte
ristics, size of i.v. inserted, number of i.v. attempts, or pain upon
intradermal injection. Conclusion: Saline with benzyl alcohol and 1% l
idocaine are equally effective as intradermal anesthetics for i.v. lin
e placement in children, and are both more effective than no anesthesi
a.