Confronted with issues fraught with the enormous complexity, policy ma
kers have shown a proclivity towards considering and enacting simple a
nd apparently equitable structures that can be easily explained to and
understood by their constituents, In the global change arena, this te
ndency seems to lead to consideration of global emissions targets defi
ned by levels achieved in some specific year along a previously unregu
lated trajectory, The question raised then is one of determining which
year's emissions would, if set as a global limit, maximize the discou
nted net benefit of the policy? In addition, how sensitive is that yea
r to changes in the damages associated with a doubling of atmospheric
concentrations of greenhouse gases anchor the pace of near-term, unreg
ulated emissions of those gases? Results produced here support two qua
litative results that speak to the answers to these questions. Support
for limiting emission below levels that would be achieved along almos
t any reasonable unregulated trajectory prior to the year 2020 require
s, first of all, accepting the notion that doubling damages will be at
least 5% of world GDP, Secondly, discovering that the globe is moving
along an emissions trajectory that is higher than otherwise expected
need not imply that the target year for fixing emissions should be mov
ed forward; indeed, higher emissions sometimes mean that the discounte
d net benefit of fixing emissions climbs as the target year is pushed
further into the future. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights res
erved.