EFFECTS OF BENAZEPRIL ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE IN COMPARISON WITH FELODIPINE EXTENDED-RELEASE IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH MILD-TO-MODERATE ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION
R. Fogari et al., EFFECTS OF BENAZEPRIL ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE IN COMPARISON WITH FELODIPINE EXTENDED-RELEASE IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH MILD-TO-MODERATE ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION, Current therapeutic research, 59(4), 1998, pp. 246-256
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy","Medicine, Research & Experimental
The sim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of t
wo antihypertensive regimens-one using benazepril, eventually combined
with hydrochlorothiazide in nonresponders, and the other using titrat
ion of felodipine extended release (ER)-in elderly patients with hyper
tension. After a 2-week washout period, 236 patients (127 men and 109
women aged 65 to 80 years) with mild-to-moderate essential hypertensio
n (systolic blood pressure [SBP] greater than or equal to 160 mm Hg an
d diastolic blood pressure [DBP] greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg), w
ere given benazepril 10 mg once daily (n = 118) or felodipine ER 5 mg
once daily (n = 118) for 4 weeks, according to a multicenter, randomiz
ed, double-masked design. At the end of this treatment period, patient
s responding to treatment were kept at the same dose of their respecti
ve randomized drug for an additional 8 weeks. The nonresponders were g
iven the fixed combination benazepril 10 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 1
2.5 mg or felodipine ER 10 mg. Patients were examined at the end of th
e washout period and every 4 weeks thereafter. At each visit, sitting
SEP and DBP were measured with a mercury sphygmomanometer and heart ra
te by radial pulse palpation. Adverse events were recorded. Both benaz
epril and felodipine ER were similarly effective in reducing SBP and D
BP. No significant differences between the two treatment groups were o
bserved in the mean decreases in blood pressure or in the number or pe
rcentage of patients with successful responses to treatment. Both trea
tments were well tolerated; the incidence of drug-related side effects
, however, was slightly but significantly higher in the felodipine ER-
treated group than in the benazepril group (14.4% vs 8.5%). In conclus
ion, benazepril 10 mg given as monotherapy, or as a fixed combination
with hydrochlorothiazide in nonresponders, and felodipine ER 5 mg, tit
rated to 10 mg in nonresponders, were both effective and well tolerate
d in elderly patients with hypertension.