Al. Stanton et al., TREATMENT DECISION-MAKING AND ADJUSTMENT TO BREAST-CANCER - A LONGITUDINAL-STUDY, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 66(2), 1998, pp. 313-322
This study monitored women (N = 76) with breast cancer from diagnosis
through 1 year, and tested constructs from subjective expected utility
theory with regard to their ability to predict patients' choice of su
rgical treatment as well as psychological distress and well-being over
time. Women's positive expectancies for the consequences of treatment
generally were maintained in favorable perceptions of outcome in seve
ral realms (i.e., physician agreement, likelihood of cancer cure or re
currence, self-evaluation, likelihood of additional treatment, partner
support for option, attractiveness to partner). Assessed before the s
urgical decision-making appointment, women's expectancies for conseque
nces of the treatment options, along with age, correctly classified 94
% of the sample with regard to election of mastectomy versus breast-co
nserving procedures. Calculated from the point of decision making to 3
months later, expectancy disconfirmations and value discrepancies con
cerning particular treatment consequences predicted psychological adju
stment 3 months and 1 year after diagnosis.