DIAGNOSTIC FIBROHYSTEROSCOPIC EVALUATION OF PERIMENOPAUSAL AND POSTMENOPAUSAL UTERINE BLEEDING - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY WITH BELGIAN AND JAPANESE DATA

Authors
Citation
R. Marty, DIAGNOSTIC FIBROHYSTEROSCOPIC EVALUATION OF PERIMENOPAUSAL AND POSTMENOPAUSAL UTERINE BLEEDING - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY WITH BELGIAN AND JAPANESE DATA, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 5(1), 1998, pp. 69-73
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
ISSN journal
10743804
Volume
5
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
69 - 73
Database
ISI
SICI code
1074-3804(1998)5:1<69:DFEOPA>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
The most appropriate hysteroscope is the smallest that allows one to p erform a biopsy. We use a 3.5- or 4.9-mm Olympus flexible hysteroscope with a failure rate below 3% for office or hospital ambulatory proced ures without anesthesia or cervical dilatation. In postmenopausal wome n (with no hormone treatment) with uterine bleeding we do not perform hysteroscopy ii vaginal sonography detects endometrial thickness less than 4 mm. At this cut-off limit the calculated risk for not detecting an endometrial abnormality is 5.5%. In all other patients we prefer f ibrohysteroscopy because its diagnostic accuracy is higher than that o f vagina I ultrasound, vaginal ultrasound can easily miss a focal lesi on of hyperplasia or adenocarcinoma incipiens, and abnormal endometria l findings detected by vaginal ultrasound or sonohysterography require directed biopsy during hysteroscopy. A comparative study evaluated th e experience in our two series (286 patients), a Belgian report (251), and a Japanese report (444). Apart from myoma, 50% of findings were a trophic normal endometrium, and concordance was good ibr detecting ade nocarcinoma (+/-3%). The results suggest using the fibrohysteroscope r ather than the rigid scope because of its excellent accuracy.