Background: Traditional academic assumptions about advance care planni
ng (ACP) include the following: (1) the purpose of ACP is preparing fo
r incapacity; (2) ACP is based on the ethical principle of autonomy an
d the exercise of control; (3) the focus of ACP is completing written
advance directive forms; and (4) ACP occurs within the context of the
physician-patient relationship. These assumptions about ACP have never
been empirically validated. Objective: To examine the traditional aca
demic assumptions by exploring ACP from the perspective of patients ac
tively participating in the planning process.Methods: Forty-eight pati
ents (30 men and 18 women with a mean age of 48.3 years) who were unde
rgoing hemodialysis were interviewed 6 months after receiving an advan
ce directive form. Their experience of ACP was noted in interviewed th
at were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed. Results: The participan
ts said that their purpose in ACP was to prepare for death and dying,
and their underlying goals included the exercise of control and an att
empt to relieve burdens placed on loved ones. Advance care planning wa
s viewed as a social process, and completing a written advance directi
ve form was often regarded as unnecessary. Participants often involved
close loved ones, but physicians infrequently. Conclusions: The tradi
tional academic assumptions are not fully supported from the perspecti
ve of patients involved in ACP. The patients we interviewed stated tha
t (1) the purpose of ACP is not only preparing for incapacity but also
preparing for death; (2) ACP is not based solely on autonomy and the
exercise of control, but also on personal relationships and relieving
burdens placed on others; (3) the focus of ACP is not only on completi
ng written advance directive forms but also on the social process; and
(4) ACP does not occur solely within the context of the physician-pat
ient relationship but also within relationships with close loved ones.