T. Akasaka et al., FLOW DYNAMICS OF ANGIOGRAPHICALLY NO-FLOW PATENT INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY GRAFTS, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 31(5), 1998, pp. 1049-1056
Objectives. This study sought to assess the flow dynamics of internal
mammary artery grafts (IMAGs) in no-flow situations by use of a Dopple
r guide wire. Background. Functionally no-flow and anatomically patent
IMAGs have been reported by angiography in patients with a patent rec
ipient coronary artery. Methods. The study included 12 patients with a
n IMAG to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) in whom n
o-flow patency of the graft was suspected angiographically. Thirteen p
atients with a normally functioning IMAG whose LAD was occluded in the
proximal portion and was supplied only from the graft served as contr
ol patients. Phasic flow velocities were recorded in the distal portio
n of the graft and the recipient LAD using a 0.014-in., 15-MHz Doppler
guide wire at rest and during hyperemia (0.14-mg/kg body weight per m
in intravenous adenosine infusion). Results. There were no significant
differences in systolic (15 +/- 3 vs. 19 +/- 6 cm/s, p = NS), diastol
ic (35 +/- 11 vs. 37 +/- 7 cm/s, p = NS) and time-averaged peak veloci
ties at rest (20 +/- 5 vs. 21 +/- 5 cm/s, p = NS), during hyperemia (5
1 +/- 12 vs. 51 +/- 8 cm/s, p = NS) and in coronary flow velocity rese
rve (2.8 +/- 0.9 vs. 2.7 +/- 0.3, NS) in the native LAD in patients wi
th a no flow patent graft versus control patients. Within the graft, t
o and fro signals with systolic reversal and diastolic anterograde flo
w were seen in the no-flow patent grafts, although anterograde flow si
gnals were recorded in systole and diastole in control patients. Systo
lic (-28 +/- 19 vs. 22 +/- 9 cm/s, p < 0.01), diastolic (18 +/- 17 vs.
44 +/- 11 cm/s, p < 0.01) and time-averaged (-2 +/- 6 vs. 26 +/- 9 cm
/s, p < 0.01) peak velocities at rest were significantly smaller in th
e no-flow patent grafts than in control grafts. During hyperemia, ante
rograde flow became predominant, with a reduction in retrograde systol
ic flow signal and an increase in diastolic flow velocity and time-ave
raged peak velocity in the no-flow patent grafts, and no-flow situatio
ns disappeared temporarily. Conclusions. Functionally no-flow situatio
ns of IMAGs manifesting to and fro signals with systolic flow reversal
and diastolic antegrade low flow velocity are temporary conditions in
certain hemodynamic circumstances, and these grafts function as condu
its during hyperemic states. (C)1998 by the American College of Cardio
logy.