IS CONSTRUCTIVIST PSYCHOTHERAPY EPISTEMOLOGICALLY FLAWED

Citation
Js. Efran et Kp. Heffner, IS CONSTRUCTIVIST PSYCHOTHERAPY EPISTEMOLOGICALLY FLAWED, Journal of constructivist psychology, 11(2), 1998, pp. 89-103
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Developmental
ISSN journal
10720537
Volume
11
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
89 - 103
Database
ISI
SICI code
1072-0537(1998)11:2<89:ICPEF>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Barbara Held has taken postmodern therapists to task for making ''real ity claims'' when they have presumably committed themselves to an anti realist epistemology. She is concerned that by focusing so exclusively on individual client narratives, they ignore important aspects of the client's ''extralinguistic'' world. Held suggests that constructivist therapists adopt a ''modest realism'' within which they could (a) tai lor therapy methods to individual clients, (b) further systemize thera peutic principles, (c) give extralinguistic reality its due, and (d) m ake truth claims. The authors argue that the problems she identifies d erive largely from the distinctions with which she insists on framing the debate. They agree that constructivists are not always crystal cle ar about the implications of their epistemology, but it would accompli sh little if they were to retreat to the realist posture she proposes.