The expectation of knowing ''truth'' leads to at least 3 ''tongues'' o
r ways of considering both truth and lies. The rooted tongue reflects
the correspondence view and involves the ''lie of authority.'' The unr
ooted tongue reflects the coherence view and involves the ''lie of rel
ational totality.'' The authors propose that these 2 kinds of lies occ
ur when one gets ''tongue-tied'' in the face of experience that threat
ens one's capacity for accommodation and for further wondering. The au
thors describe a 3rd tongue, the dialectical, which considers the ''li
e'' as a given of any knowledge and thereby supports ongoing openness
to ''not knowing.'' An Isak Dinesen short story serves as the fulcrum
for discussion.