Jwm. Lee et al., DIFFERENTIAL COUPLING OF MU-OPIOID, DELTA-OPIOID, AND KAPPA-OPIOID RECEPTORS TO G-ALPHA(16)-MEDIATED STIMULATION OF PHOSPHOLIPASE-C, Journal of neurochemistry, 70(5), 1998, pp. 2203-2211
Te mu-opioid receptor has recently been shown to stimulate phosphoinos
itide-specific phospholipase C via the pertussis toxin-sensitive G(16)
protein. Given the promiscuous nature of G(16) and the high degree of
resemblance of signaling properties of the three opioid receptors, bo
th delta- and kappa-opioid receptors are likely to activate G(16). Int
eractions of delta- and kappa-opioid receptors with G(16) were examine
d by coexpressing the opioid receptors and G alpha(16) in COS-7 cells.
The delta-selective agonist [D-Pen(2),D-Pen(5)]enkephalin potently st
imulated the formation of inositol phosphates in cells coexpressing th
e delta-opioid receptor and G alpha(16). The delta-opioid receptor-med
iated stimulation of phospholipase C was absolutely dependent on the c
oexpression of G alpha(16) and exhibited appropriate ligand selectivit
y and dose dependency. Similar transfection studies revealed only weak
stimulation by the mu-opioid receptor, whereas the kappa-opioid recep
tor produced moderate phospholipase C activity. G alpha(16) thus appea
red to interact differentially with the three opioid receptors. Radiol
igand binding assays indicate that the mu-opioid receptor was expresse
d at a lower level than those of the delta- and kappa-opioid receptors
. To examine if differential coupling to G alpha(16) is prevalent, a p
anel of G(s)- or G(i)-coupled receptors was coexpressed with G alpha(1
6) in COS-7 cells and assayed for agonist-induced stimulation of phosp
holipase C. Activation of alpha(2)- and beta(2)-adrenergic, dopamine D
-1 and D-2, adenosine A(1), somatostatin-l and -2, C5a, formyl peptide
, and luteinizing hormone receptors all resulted in stimulation of pho
spholipase C, with maximal stimulations ranging from 1.5- to almost 17
-fold. These findings suggest that the promiscuous G alpha(16) can in
fact discriminate among different receptors and that such preferential
interaction might in part be due to the abundance of receptors.