The historical diffusion of lexical and grammatical features from one
pidgin to anl,ther has been well documented for the Pacific region, pa
rticularly by Baker (1993) who argued that items were spread individua
lly in the early nineteenth century via an ad hoc foreigner talk regis
ter. Noting the profound similarities between Hawai'i Creole English (
HCE) and the Caribbean English Creoles (CECs) which led Bickerton (198
1) to propose the language bioprogram hypothesis, Goodman (1985) sugge
sted a stronger model of diffusion, one which involved the transmissio
n of a structurally complex pidgin or creole from the Caribbean to Haw
ai'i. Helm (1986) and Dillard (1995) have endorsed Goodman's hypothesi
s. This study, drawing on a wealth of pidgin/creole data spanning the
previous two centuries, finds little support for Goodman's proposal Te
xtual evidence shows that the nineteenth-century pidgin of Hawai'i lac
ked not only the structure of later HCE but also displayed far stronge
r links with neighboring Pacific pidgin Englishes than the CECs. Furth
ermore, the creole TMA system and for-complementation patterns are rev
ealed to have developed late and primarily (though not entirely) withi
n the population of native-born speakers, as predicted by the bioprogr
am. However, while the Face of creolization was fairly rapid in Hawai'
i, HCE did not form entirely within a single generation.