The social-scientific discussion on globalization has produced several
versions that reflect tension and ambiguity in the object itself: glo
bal society. A number of polarities operate within the literature to e
xpress this tension, among them the distinction between global and loc
al, modern and traditional, postmodern and modern, system and life-wor
ld West and non-West and so forth. The article uses the difference bet
ween instrumental system and cultural model to outline both the basic
structures of global society and how the various polarities, while app
earing as oppositions, are actually better seen as mutually conditioni
ng ways of constructing difference and identity in global society. The
examples of such relations between nations and state and between reli
gions and religion serve to illustrate the argument. A short conclusio
n points to possible research projects for refining and testing the ma
crotheoretical model.