The unemployment rate gap between Canada and the United States poses n
ot one puzzle but two: why the gap arose in the 1980s, and then why it
persisted and grew in the 1990s? With respect to the 1980s, the evide
nce marshalled by Riddell and others showed that employment grew at si
milar rates in Canada and the United States, while labour force partic
ipation grew much faster in Canada. The unemployment insurance system
was given a key role in explaining this difference. In the 1990s, the
unemployment insurance systems have become more similar, and the Canad
ian participation rate has fallen. But the unemployment gap has grown
rather than shrunk, requiring a new set of explanations. Cyclical diff
erences have a role to play here, but are not likely to be large Enoug
h to do the trick. The growing difference in unionization rates may al
so have a role to play. The 1990s gap remains a puzzle.