V. Molinari et al., THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PATIENT, INFORMANT, SOCIAL-WORKER, AND CONSENSUS DIAGNOSES OF PERSONALITY-DISORDER IN ELDERLY DEPRESSED INPATIENTS, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry, 6(2), 1998, pp. 136-144
Two psychiatrists simultaneously administered the Personality Assessme
nt Form (PAF) to 20 depressed geropsychiatric inpatients and to 20 of
their relatives (informants). a social worker also completed PAF ratin
gs, and a consensus conference independently assigned an Axis II diagn
osis. For patient interviews, categorical and dimensional interrater r
eliability indices for cluster and total personality disorders (PDs) w
ere generally marginal. For informant interviews, categorical interrat
er reliability indices for cluster and total PDs were also marginal, b
ut dimensional reliability was high. Consistent with previous research
, agreement between categorical scores yielded by the four assessment
methods was poor, but agreement between dimensional scores was general
ly better. It appears that patients, family members, and staff maintai
n different perspectives on patients' personality that, if overlapping
, may provide useful diagnostic data.