J. Marsal et J. Girona, RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEAF WATER POTENTIAL AND GAS-EXCHANGE ACTIVITY AT DIFFERENT PHENOLOGICAL STAGES AND FRUIT LOADS IN PEACH-TREES, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 122(3), 1997, pp. 415-421
Relationships between midday (Psi(md)) and predawn (Psi(pd)) leaf wate
r potential, stomatal conductance (g(s)), and net CO, assimilation rat
e (A) mere determined at different fruit growth stages and for 2 years
with different fruit loads in a 'Sudanell' peach [Prunus persica (L)
Batsch] plot subjected to two regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) strat
egies plus a control irrigation treatment. A postharvest RDI (PRDI) tr
eatment was irrigated at 0.35 of the control after harvest, The second
treatment (SPRDI) applied RDI during Stage II, the lag phase of the f
ruit growth curve, at 0.5 of the control and postharvest at 0.35 of th
e control, The control treatment and the PRDI and SPRDI when not recei
ving RDI were irrigated at 100% of a modified Penman crop water use ca
lculation (ET0) in 1994, a full crop year, and 80% in 1995, a year of
nearly zero crop, In 1995, with 80% of the 1994 irrigation rate and no
crop, the Psi(md) was higher, probably because of the lower crop load
, while Psi(pd) was lower, probably because less water was applied to
the soil, The relationship of g(s) and A with Psi(nd) during Stage II
was steeper than during postharvest. Low Psi(md) was not indicative of
a depression in g(s) and A in Stage Iii, Osmotic leaf water potential
at turgor loss (Psi(x)(0)) as derived from pressure-volume curves was
more negative during Stage III and postharvest (about -2.9 MPa) than
in Stage II (about -2.7 MPa), The Psi(md) measurements together with P
si(pi)(0) determinations seemed to be more useful to characterize peac
h tree water status than Y-pd under soil water deficits because of the
ir better relationship to midday stomatal closure.