IMAGE-ANALYSIS OF PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN EXPRESSION AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL PROFILES IN RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA-ASSOCIATED WITH ACQUIRED CYSTIC KIDNEY-DISEASE - COMPARISON WITH CLASSIC RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA
Kk. Khurana et al., IMAGE-ANALYSIS OF PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN EXPRESSION AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL PROFILES IN RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA-ASSOCIATED WITH ACQUIRED CYSTIC KIDNEY-DISEASE - COMPARISON WITH CLASSIC RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA, Modern pathology, 11(4), 1998, pp. 339-346
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) arising in acquired cystic kidney disease (
ACKD) is considered to be a tumor of low malignant potential, compared
with classic RCC. The aim of the present study was to identify any si
gnificant differences in the antigenic profiles or tumor cell prolifer
ative activity of ACKD-associated RCC and classic RCC that might be re
sponsible for differences in their biologic behavior. We studied the i
mmunohistochemical profiles and proliferative activity of 12 classic R
CCs and 5 ACKD-associated RCCs with markers of proximal tubules (Leu M
1, alpha-1 antitrypsin, CAM 5.2), markers of distal tubules (Arachis h
ypogaea lectin, AE1/AE3, epithelial membrane antigen [EMA], CAM 5.2),
vimentin, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). We performed
proliferation analysis with the CAS 200 image analysis system. For eac
h case, 8 to 20 fields of tumor tissue in the areas of maximal PCNA st
aining were quantitated, and the percentage of PCNA-positive nuclear a
rea for each individual tumor was calculated. All of the five ACKD-ass
ociated RCCs expressed AE1/AE3, EMA, and CAM: 5.2 in more than 50% of
the tumor cells. Arachis hypogaea lectin was significantly expressed i
n three of the five ACKD-associated RCCs. Leu M1 and alpha-1 antitryps
in reacted with fewer than 10% of the tumor cells in all of the five A
CKD-associated RCCs. In contrast, the 12 classic RCCs showed expressio
n of CAM 5.2 in 11 cases, alpha-1 antitrypsin in 10 cases, Leu M1 in 9
, EMA in 8, and AE1/AE3 in 3 cases in more than 50% of the tumor cells
and a totally negative reaction with Arachis hypogaea lectin in 8 cas
es, EMA in 4, AE1/AE3 in 4, and vimentin in 5 cases. Although coexpres
sion of proximal and distal tubule markers was seen in some cases of R
CC hl either category, there was uniform and strong staining for dista
l tubule markers in ACKD-associated RCC and for proximal tubule makers
in classic RCC. The mean percentage of PCNA-positive nuclear area for
the ACKD-associated RCCs (2.41%) was significantly (P < .05) less tha
n that of the classic RCCs (21.42%). The differences in expression of
proximal and distal tubule markers and proliferative activity might be
responsible for the differences in the biologic behavior of ACKD-asso
ciated RCC and classic RCC.