IMAGE-ANALYSIS OF PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN EXPRESSION AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL PROFILES IN RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA-ASSOCIATED WITH ACQUIRED CYSTIC KIDNEY-DISEASE - COMPARISON WITH CLASSIC RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA

Citation
Kk. Khurana et al., IMAGE-ANALYSIS OF PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN EXPRESSION AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL PROFILES IN RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA-ASSOCIATED WITH ACQUIRED CYSTIC KIDNEY-DISEASE - COMPARISON WITH CLASSIC RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA, Modern pathology, 11(4), 1998, pp. 339-346
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology
Journal title
ISSN journal
08933952
Volume
11
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
339 - 346
Database
ISI
SICI code
0893-3952(1998)11:4<339:IOPCNA>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) arising in acquired cystic kidney disease ( ACKD) is considered to be a tumor of low malignant potential, compared with classic RCC. The aim of the present study was to identify any si gnificant differences in the antigenic profiles or tumor cell prolifer ative activity of ACKD-associated RCC and classic RCC that might be re sponsible for differences in their biologic behavior. We studied the i mmunohistochemical profiles and proliferative activity of 12 classic R CCs and 5 ACKD-associated RCCs with markers of proximal tubules (Leu M 1, alpha-1 antitrypsin, CAM 5.2), markers of distal tubules (Arachis h ypogaea lectin, AE1/AE3, epithelial membrane antigen [EMA], CAM 5.2), vimentin, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). We performed proliferation analysis with the CAS 200 image analysis system. For eac h case, 8 to 20 fields of tumor tissue in the areas of maximal PCNA st aining were quantitated, and the percentage of PCNA-positive nuclear a rea for each individual tumor was calculated. All of the five ACKD-ass ociated RCCs expressed AE1/AE3, EMA, and CAM: 5.2 in more than 50% of the tumor cells. Arachis hypogaea lectin was significantly expressed i n three of the five ACKD-associated RCCs. Leu M1 and alpha-1 antitryps in reacted with fewer than 10% of the tumor cells in all of the five A CKD-associated RCCs. In contrast, the 12 classic RCCs showed expressio n of CAM 5.2 in 11 cases, alpha-1 antitrypsin in 10 cases, Leu M1 in 9 , EMA in 8, and AE1/AE3 in 3 cases in more than 50% of the tumor cells and a totally negative reaction with Arachis hypogaea lectin in 8 cas es, EMA in 4, AE1/AE3 in 4, and vimentin in 5 cases. Although coexpres sion of proximal and distal tubule markers was seen in some cases of R CC hl either category, there was uniform and strong staining for dista l tubule markers in ACKD-associated RCC and for proximal tubule makers in classic RCC. The mean percentage of PCNA-positive nuclear area for the ACKD-associated RCCs (2.41%) was significantly (P < .05) less tha n that of the classic RCCs (21.42%). The differences in expression of proximal and distal tubule markers and proliferative activity might be responsible for the differences in the biologic behavior of ACKD-asso ciated RCC and classic RCC.