Mj. Daniels et al., MORPHOLOGICAL AND PELAGE CHARACTERISTICS OF WILD LIVING CATS IN SCOTLAND - IMPLICATIONS FOR DEFINING THE WILDCAT, Journal of zoology, 244, 1998, pp. 231-247
The indigenous wildcat, Felis silvestris Schreber, 1775, and the intro
duced domestic cat, F. catus L., have been sympatric in Britain for mo
re than 2000 years. As a result of interbreeding, any distinction betw
een these two forms has become obscured, although a range of morpholog
ical criteria (pelage patterns, body measurements, gut lengths, skull
morphometrics) and genetic techniques (immunological distances, electr
ophoresis, DNA hybridization) have been used previously to distinguish
between them. A sample of 333 wild-living cats in Scotland was assess
ed for coloration and markings of pelage, standard body measurements a
nd weights, and (for carcasses only) limb bone lengths, intestine leng
ths, and skull measurements. These cats were also classified as wildca
t, hybrid, or domestic cat according to traditional pelage criteria. M
ultivariate analyses on these variables, for adult cats, failed to sho
w any clearly distinct groups. When each of the variables was analysed
separately, only the distribution of limb bone and intestine length m
easurements suggested the possibility that two groups might exist. Gro
up 1 cats had short intestines and long limb bones. Group 2 consisted
of cats with long intestines and short limb bones. Although the charac
teristics defining cats in Group 1 were similar to those traditionally
associated with wildcats, they exhibited a much broader range of pela
ge and coloration than traditionally described. The groups exhibited a
degree of geographical separation. The distribution of Group 1 cats w
as found to be related to certain environmental variables, namely mean
annual temperature and land with poor potential for forestry and agri
culture, suggesting that there may be a biological basis for the separ
ation. The implications of these results on the identification and tax
onomy of the wildcat are significant. The concept of the wildcat and t
he domestic cat as separate species can be challenged. The paper highl
ights the complexity and difficulties for conventional taxonomy when u
sed as a means for distinguishing between a wild type and its domestic
ated form where there is interbreeding.