MORPHOLOGICAL AND PELAGE CHARACTERISTICS OF WILD LIVING CATS IN SCOTLAND - IMPLICATIONS FOR DEFINING THE WILDCAT

Citation
Mj. Daniels et al., MORPHOLOGICAL AND PELAGE CHARACTERISTICS OF WILD LIVING CATS IN SCOTLAND - IMPLICATIONS FOR DEFINING THE WILDCAT, Journal of zoology, 244, 1998, pp. 231-247
Citations number
79
Categorie Soggetti
Zoology
Journal title
ISSN journal
09528369
Volume
244
Year of publication
1998
Part
2
Pages
231 - 247
Database
ISI
SICI code
0952-8369(1998)244:<231:MAPCOW>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
The indigenous wildcat, Felis silvestris Schreber, 1775, and the intro duced domestic cat, F. catus L., have been sympatric in Britain for mo re than 2000 years. As a result of interbreeding, any distinction betw een these two forms has become obscured, although a range of morpholog ical criteria (pelage patterns, body measurements, gut lengths, skull morphometrics) and genetic techniques (immunological distances, electr ophoresis, DNA hybridization) have been used previously to distinguish between them. A sample of 333 wild-living cats in Scotland was assess ed for coloration and markings of pelage, standard body measurements a nd weights, and (for carcasses only) limb bone lengths, intestine leng ths, and skull measurements. These cats were also classified as wildca t, hybrid, or domestic cat according to traditional pelage criteria. M ultivariate analyses on these variables, for adult cats, failed to sho w any clearly distinct groups. When each of the variables was analysed separately, only the distribution of limb bone and intestine length m easurements suggested the possibility that two groups might exist. Gro up 1 cats had short intestines and long limb bones. Group 2 consisted of cats with long intestines and short limb bones. Although the charac teristics defining cats in Group 1 were similar to those traditionally associated with wildcats, they exhibited a much broader range of pela ge and coloration than traditionally described. The groups exhibited a degree of geographical separation. The distribution of Group 1 cats w as found to be related to certain environmental variables, namely mean annual temperature and land with poor potential for forestry and agri culture, suggesting that there may be a biological basis for the separ ation. The implications of these results on the identification and tax onomy of the wildcat are significant. The concept of the wildcat and t he domestic cat as separate species can be challenged. The paper highl ights the complexity and difficulties for conventional taxonomy when u sed as a means for distinguishing between a wild type and its domestic ated form where there is interbreeding.