F. Bokstein et al., LEPTOMENINGEAL METASTASES FROM SOLID TUMORS - A COMPARISON OF 2 PROSPECTIVE SERIES TREATED WITH AND WITHOUT INTRA-CEREBROSPINAL FLUID CHEMOTHERAPY, Cancer, 82(9), 1998, pp. 1756-1763
BACKGROUND. It has been suggested that an aggressive treatment of pati
ents with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) that groups radiotherapy and
intra-cerebrospinal fluid (intra-CSF) chemotherapy has improved treatm
ent outcomes. Based on their previous series of 137 patients treated w
ith such an intensive standard protocol, the authors expected 20% of t
he patients to maintain their responses for at least 6 months after wi
thdrawal of therapy. They also observed that, in patients with solid t
umors, a partial response was compatable with sustained off-therapy re
sponse and that the maximal response was reached soon after completion
of radiotherapy. The authors concluded that the role of intra-CSF che
motherapy, with its associated high rate of complications, is unclear.
In this study, which was a further evaluation of this dilemma, they c
ompared the outcomes of two prospective treatment protocols that were
identical in their use of radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy and v
aried only in their inclusion or exclusion of intra-CSF chemotherapy.
METHODS. Adult patients with LM from systemic solid tumors were prospe
ctively included in the treatment protocol active at the time of their
diagnosis. Group 1 comprised 54 patients treated by radiotherapy, int
ra-CSF chemotherapy, and systemic therapy, whereas Group 2 comprised 5
0 patients treated with radiotherapy, and systemic chemotherapy but no
intra-CSF chemotherapy. RESULTS. The analysis of treatment outcomes w
as performed retrospectively. The median patient age and distribution
of primary neoplasms did not differ between the two groups. The propor
tion of early deaths that occurred during radiotherapy was similar for
the two groups, as was the overall rate of response to treatment. The
two groups also had the same median survival, which was 4 months for
both groups, as well as the same proportion of long term survivors. Th
irty-one percent of patients in Group 1 developed early complications
related to intra-CSF chemotherapy, whereas patients in Group 2 were sp
ared these complications. Delayed symptomatic leukoencephalopathy was
observed in 20% of Group 1 patients compared with none in Group 2 (P =
0.02). CONCLUSIONS, The exclusion of intra-CSF chemotherapy from the
treatment schedule of patients with LM does not change their overall r
esponse to treatment, their median survival, or the proportion of long
term survivors. It does, however, significantly reduce the rate of ea
rly and delayed treatment-related complications. (C) 1998 American Can
cer Society.