Fd. Gilliland et al., TRENDS IN THE SURVIVAL OF AMERICAN-INDIAN, HISPANIC, AND NON-HISPANICWHITE CANCER-PATIENTS IN NEW-MEXICO AND ARIZONA, 1969-1994, Cancer, 82(9), 1998, pp. 1769-1783
BACKGROUND. The burden of cancer mortality falls disproportionately on
cancer patients belonging to ethnic minority groups. In the U.S., Afr
ican American, Hispanic, and American Indian cancer patients are diagn
osed at a more advanced stage and receive less appropriate treatment,
resulting in poorer outcomes and higher mortality, than white cancer p
atients. The authors hypothesized that cancer control strategies based
on earlier detection and more effective treatment may be most effecti
ve in increasing survival in groups with more advanced disease at diag
nosis. less appropriate treatment, and lower survival. METHODS. Data c
ollected by the New Mexico Tumor Registry, a member organization of th
e Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the Na
tional Cancer Institute, afforded the authors an opportunity to invest
igate this hypothesis by studying trends in cancer survival for Americ
an Indians, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic whites. The authors examined t
emporal trends and ethnic disparities in survival for in situ and inva
sive incident cancer cases at 25 sites diagnosed from 1969 through 199
4 in New Mexico residents and in American Indians residing in Arizona.
RESULTS, The distribution of stage became more favorable and the perc
entage of patients receiving appropriate treatment increased for all t
hree ethnic groups during the study period. Survival improved for pati
ents with cancer at most sites in each ethnic group; however, because
the increase in survival was greater for non-Hispanic whites than for
American Indians or Hispanics, the number of sites associated with dis
parities in survival among non-Hispanic whiles, American Indians, and
Hispanics increased. Differences in the distribution of age, gender, s
tage at diagnosis, histologic grade, and treatment did not completely
explain the improved survival or the ethnic disparities regarding surv
ival. CONCLUSIONS. Increased cancer control efforts were associated wi
th earlier diagnosis, more patients receiving appropriate therapy, and
improved survival for non-Hispanic whites, American Indians, and Hisp
anics. However, the improvement was greatest for non-Hispanic whites,
and disparities in survival results for the different ethnic groups wi
dened over the period of study. Cancer control strategies need to addr
ess the specific social, cultural, and biologic prognostic factors tha
t affect different ethnic groups if disparities in outcomes are to be
reduced. (C) 1998 American Cancer Society.