Kb. Michels et al., PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKER USE, CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE, AND TOTAL MORTALITY AMONG HYPERTENSIVE WOMEN - THE NURSES HEALTH STUDY, Circulation, 97(16), 1998, pp. 1540-1548
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Peripheal Vascular Diseas",Hematology,"Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Background-In several observational studies, patients prescribed calci
um channel blockers had higher risks of cardiovascular diseases and mo
rtality than those prescribed other antihypertensive medications. We e
xplored these associations in the Nurses' Health Study. Methods and Re
sults-A total of 14 617 women who reported hypertension and regular us
e of diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitor
s, or a combination in 1988 were included in the analyses. Cardiovascu
lar events and deaths were ascertained through May 1, 1994. We documen
ted 234 cases of myocardial infarction. Calcium channel blocker monodr
ug users had an age-adjusted relative risk (RR) of myocardial infarcti
on of 2.36 (95% CI, 1.43 to 3.91) compared with those prescribed thiaz
ide diuretics. Women prescribed calcium channel blockers had a higher
prevalence of ischemic heart disease. After adjustment for these and o
ther coronary risk factors, the RR was 1.63 (95% CI, 0.97 to 2.77). Co
mparing the use of any calcium channel blocker (monodrug and multidrug
users) with that of any other antihypertensive agent, the adjusted RR
was 1.42 (95% CI, 1.01 to 2.01). An association between calcium chann
el blocker use and myocardial infarction was apparent among women who
had ever smoked cigarettes (covariate-adjusted RR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.20
to 2.72) but not among never-smokers (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.84).
Conclusions-In analyses adjusted only for age, we found a significant
elevation in RR of total myocardial infarction among women who used c
alcium channel blockers compared with those who did not. After adjustm
ent for comorbidity and other covariates, the RR was reduced. Whether
the remaining observed elevated risk is real, or a result of residual
confounding by indication, or chance, or a combination of the above ca
nnot be evaluated with certainty on the basis of these observational d
ata.