Thrombolytic therapy has been a major advance in the management of acu
te myocardial infarction. Unfortunately, it continues to be underused
or is administered later than is optimal. Thrombolytic therapy works b
y lysing infarct artery thrombi and achieving reperfusion, thereby red
ucing infarct size, preserving left ventricular function, and improvin
g survival. The most effective thrombolytic regimens achieve angiograp
hic epicardial infarct-artery patency in only approximate to 50% of pa
tients within 90 minutes. Bleeding requiring transfusion occurs in app
roximate to 5% of patients and stroke in approximate to 1.8% with thes
e regimens, which include adjunctive aspirin and intravenous heparin.
There are several ways in which reperfusion rates and thus patient out
comes might be improved, such as different dosing regimens of establis
hed agents; combinations of different agents; improved adjunctive ther
apy such as direct antithrombin agents, low-molecular-weight heparin,
or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists; or the development of n
ovel thrombolytic agents with enhanced fibrin specificity, resistance
to native inhibitors, or prolonged half-lives allowing bolus administr
ation. All of these strategies are being tested in clinical trials. Th
e best approach currently is to administer thrombolytic therapy as soo
n as possible to all patients without contraindications who present wi
thin 12 hours of symptom onset and have ST-segment elevation on the EC
G or new-onset left bundle-branch block, unless an alternative reperfu
sion strategy is planned.