Im. Jou et Ka. Lai, NEUROMONITORING OF AN EXPERIMENTAL-MODEL OF CLIP COMPRESSION ON THE SPINAL NERVE ROOT TO CHARACTERIZE ACUTE NERVE ROOT INJURY, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 23(8), 1998, pp. 932-939
Objectives. To evaluate the sensitivity of an electromonitoring method
in acute nerve root injury, and to determine a proposed criterion for
irreversible electrophysiologic degradation. Study Design. Acute nerv
e root injury was induced by a clip compression model in rabbits, mimi
cking nerve root injury by a transpedicular screw. A common neuromonit
oring technique, spinal somatosensory-evoked potential, was used to st
udy the electrophysiologic change during the procedure. Summary of Bac
kground Data. With the advent of the transpedicular screw system, incr
eased risk of injury to the spinal root because of the passage of scre
ws is not unexpected. Although both an experimental model and a clinic
al application in intraoperative neuromonitoring of spinal cord functi
on have been established, the value df neuromonitoring of an acute spi
nal root injury remains obscure. Several neurophysiologic surveillance
techniques have been used successfully to monitor the potential injur
y to the spinal cord during orthopedic procedures around the spinal co
rd and spinal column. Spinal somatosensory-evoked potential, which has
the advantages of high amplitude and quick recording time, is used to
detect nerve root impairment during the insertion of transpedicular s
crews. Methods, Experimental acute nerve root injury was induced in ra
bbits by direct hemostatic clip compression on the nerve root (S1) dur
ing different time intervals. Spinal somatosensory-evoked potential el
icited by stimulating the sciatic nerve and recorded from a needle ele
ctrode at the L6-L7 interspinous ligament was monitored immediately be
fore and after compression. Results. Spinal somatosensory-evoked poten
tial is sensitive enough to detect the compromise of a single nerve ro
ot and that a decrease in the amplitude is the most reliable and sensi
tive sign. With this model, there was a statistically significant corr
elation between the compression time and reduction of amplitude and de
lay of latency. The critical criterion for irreversible electrophysiol
ogic change was an amplitude loss of more than 20% and a delay in late
ncy immediately after nerve root compression. Conclusions. It was conc
luded that spinal somatosensory-evoked potential can provide immediate
feedback of nerve root injury and should be considered for use during
the dynamic phase of transpedicular screw insertion.