Jfm. Meaney et al., DIAGNOSIS OF PULMONARY-EMBOLISM WITH MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY, The New England journal of medicine, 336(20), 1997, pp. 1422-1427
Background Diagnosing pulmonary embolism may be difficult, because the
re is no reliable noninvasive imaging method. We compared a new noninv
asive method, gadolinium-enhanced pulmonary magnetic resonance angiogr
aphy, with standard pulmonary angiography for diagnosing pulmonary emb
olism. Methods A total of 30 consecutive patients with suspected pulmo
nary embolism underwent both standard pulmonary angiography and magnet
ic resonance angiography during the pulmonary arterial phase at the ti
me of an intravenous bolus of gadolinium. All magnetic resonance image
s were reviewed for the presence or absence of pulmonary emboli by thr
ee independent reviewers who were unaware of the findings on standard
angiograms. Results Pulmonary embolism was detected by standard pulmon
ary angiography in 8 of the 30 patients in whom pulmonary embolism was
suspected. All 5 lobar emboli and 16 of 17 segmental emboli identifie
d on standard angiograms were also identified on magnetic resonance im
ages. Two of the three reviewers reported one false positive magnetic
resonance angiogram each. As compared with standard pulmonary angiogra
phy, the three sets of readings had sensitivities of 100, 87, and 75 p
ercent and specificities of 95, 100, and 95 percent, respectively. The
interobserver correlation was good (k=0.57 to 0.83 for all vessels, 0
.49 to 1.0 for main and lobar vessels, and 0.40 to 0.81 for segmental
vessels). Conclusions In this preliminary study, gadolinium-enhanced m
agnetic resonance angiography of the pulmonary arteries, as compared w
ith conventional pulmonary angiography, had high sensitivity and speci
ficity for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. This new technique sho
ws promise as a noninvasive method of diagnosing pulmonary embolism wi
thout the need for ionizing radiation or iodinated contrast material.
(C) 1997, Massachusetts Medical Society.